The Trial of Harry Croswell
1804
![]() |
|
JAMES KENT "Kent wrote a masterful
opinion decreeing a new trial for Croswell. The power of his personality
and his reasoning persuaded his fellow associate justices, Livingston
and Thompson, to abandon their Jeffersonian principles and agree with
him -- at first. But Chief Justice Lewis, by now running hard for
Governor, wrote a contrary opinion of his own. He also paid Livingston
a little visit, whereupon Livingston suddenly changed his mind. The
court thus divided two and two, and the motion for a new trial was
denied. New York senators and assemblymen, having heard Hamilton's
eloquence, had set to work on a truth-in-libel bill that was certain
to pass; the Chief Justice was upholding a legal principle that was
about to be officially invalidated. So the case was simply dropped.
Its impact, however, was important: [o]ther states would soon follow
New York's lead, transforming Harry Crosswell's case from a cause
celebre into one of the bulwarks of our free press." -Great Crimes & Trials, from "American Heritage Magazine" by Thomas J. Fleming NY 1973 (Reprint of Article, Dec. 1967) |